FEATURE

Dancing the Wild

The Emerging Work of Chris Tolian

by JOHN YATES

It is customary to restrict literary criticism to established writers who are either well known or at least poised on the brink of success. Emerging writers are an unknown quantity, and critics regard them as untouchables until either publishing or commercial success has been attained. The flaw in this practice is that writers who achieve success usually conform to the fashions of their time. They walk known paths and don’t stray too far beyond explored territory. On occasion, a writer emerges who happens to catch the wave of cultural changes and is propelled into the forefront before he or she has had time to season and develop. This is rare, however, and has been non-existent in the current era when our culture seems to be mired in confusion and timidity, and new directions are not emerging from the mainstream. Yet there are a few contemporary writers – for the most part, they are almost completely unknown – who are trying to see through the fog and create vibrant literature that can speak to people today. Chris Tolian is one of those writers. Tolian, who lives in the Chicago area, has begun to forge a voice that is both honest and eloquent, and speaks to the heart of modern life. Not surprisingly, his work has been ignored and only rarely finds its way into publication.

Writers like Tolian emerge from stagnant eras like a flare of brilliant light. Invariably, they are ignored or castigated by the critics until many years have passed. Perhaps Henry Miller is the most striking example of this phenomenon. Miller struggled to write and simply to survive for 30 years before his best work could be sold without a brown paper wrapper. Other examples include writers as diverse as Jack Kerouac, Walt Whitman, Anais Nin, Ayn Rand and Henry David Thoreau. These luminaries literally reinvented our culture, but were spurned, ignored or laughed off the stage for most of their lifetimes. Other writers (Lenore Kandel and Alan Watts come to mind) were vanguards of change and enjoyed brief recognition – but usually as rebels rather than writers - and then faded from view. Still others (I am thinking of Thomas Sanchez and J.D. Salinger) showed signs of brilliance, but simply gave up, burned out or sold their souls. A soul that has been sold almost never can be bought back. There always have been a few – a very few – writers who did not give up, burn out or sell out. They broke the rules and forged into unexplored territory. They used to be called the avante garde, but now the term has been appropriated by the merely hip and slick who revel in a post-Warhol climate of smug chic. Literary critics invariably have lagged behind major changes in writing, often by several decades, and their usual role has been to reinforce the status quo and keep change at bay. Few critics have dared to look deeply into the lifeblood of their culture and search for writers whose work might reinvent literature to reflect the reality of the times, and perhaps to come a step closer to that elusive state which might be called truth.

If honest writers whose work has signaled major cultural changes have one thing in common, it is that all of them have had something to say and saw meaning during a time when literature was devoid of meaning, floundered in an echo chamber of purposelessness, and concentrated more on appearances than substance. Visionary writers also share the trait of having reinvented language and style to propel their visions into a reality that could speak in a way that makes sense to their readers. Tolian’s work qualifies as visionary in all of those respects. It has not come easily for him, however. His earliest work often tried to find a niche in stale genre writing, and sometimes he has been overtly imitative of writers and styles that have influenced him, such as the Beats. Yet, even in his least satisfying work, one can see a unique and vibrant voice and perspective struggling to emerge. His latest work abandons any pretense of trying to fit in to existing formulas, and the voice and style that he has developed are uniquely his own. He speaks purposefully to contemporary realities in a way that can touch people deeply, and his work is a powerful antidote to the lifeless sterility that defines most contemporary poetry and prose.  

Finding Tolian’s work will not be easy. Prior to this month’s edition of The Divine Animal, only four of his short stories have been published (in three online journals: Slow Trains, Clean Sheets and The Divine Animal). His unpublished work includes several short stories, a novel in progress, a poem and several genre pieces written unsuccessfully for fantasy and horror markets. Given this small body of work, a critical discussion of it arguably could be called premature. Yet, the voice and style that have emerged in his work have the potential to play an important role in liberating contemporary literature from the strictures that have made it virtually meaningless to most people, inaccessible on a human level, and irrelevant to life. Only time will tell if Tolian has the strength and dedication to persevere on his path, or for the accuracy of my opinions about his writing to be tested. Yet, it also would be foolish to deny criticism the important role of calling attention to new work that is unique and powerful. There is no reason why a critic should be seen as an adversary of emerging writers, and no reason not to define criticism as visionary in its own right.

Tolian as Anti-Hero

Tolian’s work is frankly autobiographical. He is the main character in his own stories, in the same sense that Henry Miller was the subject of his own work. The character of Chris Tolian often is confused and adrift. He has no easy answers or formulas for meaning. Sometimes he drinks too much and sometimes he is stoned. Sometimes he feels hopeless, and there is a thread of stark despair in many of his characters, who are searching for a reason to go on living. In every story, Tolian and his characters must struggle to find and reconcile themselves to the realities of their lives. None of it comes easy. His characters search for and find meaning in a world that often appears meaningless. A unique quality to Tolian’s work is that his characters do find meaning, and that the meaning they find stands the test of reality for the reader. It feels real. He offers no panaceas and does not hide behind sentimentality. He also spurns the easier and far more often traveled paths of wallowing in meaninglessness and despair, or of being a romantic rebel without a cause.  

Taking action is at the heart of Tolian’s vision of life. He distrusts philosophy and talking about life. Instead, he lives it. That is a message repeated over and over again in his work: that life is for the living. For Tolian, music, dancing, love and eros are metaphors for being alive, and they also are life itself. They are “to dance the wild,” and that is the sacred dance of life. Wildness and dance, love and eros, are the meaning of life Tolian delineates in his fiction. His personal life, however, adds another dimension to life’s meaning and also to the necessity for taking action. In real life, Tolian, 28, is married and devotes himself totally to providing for his wife and four daughters. While he rebels against what this has meant for him, the fact remains that Tolian has been a dedicated father since he turned 18 and his family forms the cornerstone of his existence. He has yet to reconcile this aspect of his life with his writing. Perhaps this will be a future stage in his development as a writer. In both aspects of Tolian, however, taking action is the key to being alive.

In this regard, the overall feeling of Tolian’s work is reminiscent of The Rebel, by French existentialist philosopher Albert Camus (although it is probable that Tolian isn’t aware of this parallel). Camus sees life as essentially a choice between murder and suicide. By murder, he means taking action in life according to one’s needs, values and perceptions, even in the face of doubt, uncertainly or even absurdity. By suicide, Camus means denying or obliterating oneself by yielding to despair, ennui or meaninglessness. The basic choice, for Camus, is between living and dying on all levels of existence. This is, perhaps, the central human issue in living in the modern world that seemingly has obliterated every expression of life’s meaning that has been seen as a reason for living for most of humankind’s history. Tolian’s work reclaims the primal human essence of meaning through action, and through the powerful forces of music, dance, love, eros and wildness. When in despair, dance! When in doubt, allow yourself to be swept away by music. When life seems empty, seek the beauty of life, love and lust. Carried into his personal life, devotion is the answer to ennui (even if it comes with considerable kicking and screaming). If there is a message in Tolian’s work, it is that life must be lived on purely human terms to have meaning. He simply isn’t interested in philosophy, politics, religion, social roles or other external ideas that are imposed on people.

“Love is love is sex is desire is passion is life,” he wrote in a letter. “I know of no other pure thing.”  

Tolian (as his own fictional character) becomes the archetypal anti-hero, who stumbles and staggers through life in an alcoholic haze, has no easy answers and sometimes becomes destructively obsessive or even delusional. Yet, he always is alive and seeking life. Music enlivens his soul, dance captures his body, beautiful women fill his heart with passion and love, and devotion and respect follow naturally. Answers and certainty aren’t necessities for being alive. Life is its own justification.

 

His writing does not duck the hard questions of modern life and, like all good writers I know of, he has a deep but understated sense of compassion. “The industrial world is ugly and beautiful at the same time,” he wrote in a letter. “…We’ve come so far, yet destroyed so much…We rape the world and each other, killing and taking and damn the consequences…so much beauty tainted by so much death, darkness.” He writes of weeping when he sees documentaries of landing on the Moon because he also sees news footage of children being blown apart in war, which he defines as “a collective manifestation of the monster in each of us.”  

Despite those dark perceptions, he also sees love, beauty, hope and faith as “the defining aspect of humanity…I cannot look into a child’s eyes and say, ‘Fuck it. Game over. Good luck.’ There has to be a way to redeem our existence, even if there never was a nobility, a purity there originally. There is the potential. There is the capacity to heal, to find the strength to carry hope.”

 

Dancar Tempestuoso          Hongaarz Zonnebad ©2004 Ingrid Swillers

Tolian found his own voice – in full resonance – in “Dancar Tempestuoso,” a short story published in Slow Trains, an online literary journal. This story marks Tolian’s abandonment of any pretense of commercial or genre writing, although strong signs of this impending change had begun to appear in his earlier writings.  The shift in perspective in Tolian’s writing is every bit as dramatic as a comparison of the stuffy, stilted writing in Jack Kerouac’s first novel, The Town and The City, with the freedom and energy of On The Road, or with the cardboard style of Henry Miller’s Crazy Cock, compared to the vibrancy and life of Tropic of Cancer. In “Dancar Tempestuoso,” Tolian allowed himself to write the story as he felt it should be told, in imagery and language that are his and his alone. He also clearly defines the themes and meanings that are at the heart of almost all of his work. The story begins by inverting time and looking back on itself, as Tolian heads back into the city to the wild music and “manic passion” that is both life itself and “just one more addiction. One more thing to kill myself with.” The story itself, however, does not reflect the kind of self-doubts Tolian expressed when looking back at it. The story is about passion and life that soars above the decadence of modern Chicago and the grind of daily life.

The setting is Christmastime, and Tolian walks past old memories of family and children and enters a speakeasy, where he is assaulted by a crush of humanity, rushing energy, lights, smoke and scents as a backdrop for crazily alive music that mixes flamenco, Mexican, Gypsy, Brazilian, blues and jazz.

Voices lost, consciousness wavers on the verge of becoming something

more, or less, human. Animal. Primitive. This is music. This is dance…

Dancing among gods and angels and monsters. Not caring about

the previous moment or the next. The desperate passion of the music.

            A woman presses against him and she “moves with the music as if it is her breath and blood.” His “flesh burns with the contact, hot and alive,” and their bodies become like instruments as the band catches a “tribal rhythm” and the music becomes “a surreal thunderstorm.” There is an immediate and electrically charged connection between Tolian and the woman, Re (not her real name: she insists on anonymity), who is from Brazil. She says she must leave, but asks him to meet her at a coffeehouse at midnight. Like most of Tolian’s women characters, Re is small and slim, almost waif-like, with dark eyes that he sees as “deep, mysterious.” Tolian meets her at midnight and feels

…a vague desperation, maybe for some deeper connection. Doesn’t happen often these days. Most relationships are knowingly shallow or have a half-empty, apathetic quality…Without that connection, faith and certainty, conviction or any sense of humanity tend to quickly diminish…this connection is something I crave too much. I pray that I am not imagining it.

Re cements the connection by calling the music “amazing…Spirit rebellious, to dance the wild.” When Tolian tries to put those thoughts in formal language, she chides him for being “too philosophical.” The connection established, Tolian and Re enter the city and the night. They go to a party in the midst of utter decadence, where money and expensive wines flow in a room filled with drag queens and prostitutes. They escape to the streets, where Tolian paints a wonderful scene of them dancing in the snow to a Salvation Army band playing “Silent Night.”  

The lovers take a hotel room, filling it with lit candles and the sounds of the blues. They drink, smoke (Tolian is refreshingly politically incorrect) and talk. Re won’t tell Tolian her real name, and doesn’t want to know his. “Names are like a mask,” she says. “I don’t want you to wear one.” She asks him only to be real, in the here and now, and to make no promises, but then beats his chest and beseeches him to “know me.” She weeps. Tolian’s writing takes on the understated tones of Hemingway (but not imitatively so) as she asks him to tell her that he loves her. He tells her he does and tells himself that, odd as it may sound, he does love her. She asks him if he has ever felt deep regret, and he tries to reassure her with hollow words about acceptance and becoming one’s self. She silences him gently and ironically calls him “confidant and beautiful,” and then asks him again to tell her that he loves her, and that he would die for her. He speaks the words a little too quickly, and she says sadly that he is lying. He tells her again that he loves her, and she leans into him.

           The music changes to plaintive violins, and Tolian drinks in the scent of cinnamon, spices and sweat (an olfactory combination that Tolian writes about often), “the pure animal scent of her.” They kiss and make love in “passion and abandon,” and the sounds of their lovemaking mean more to Tolian than the most sincere promise. The lovers “make space in this world only for each other.” In the morning, however, there is a distance between them as parting becomes near. They do not close that distance, but do reaffirm the connection between them. Tolian ends the story on a note of deliberate ambiguity.

PAGE 2